LONDON,
April 1 (IslamOnline.net & News Agencies) - The war-time media
campaign being waged by Britain alongside its ground offensive on Iraq
has suffered severe setbacks and eroded the authority of Prime Minister
Tony Blair's government, charged a British propaganda expert.
"The
British propaganda operation has been a litany of blunders, it's been
lamentable," Tim Crook, a media studies lecturer at the University
of London, told Agence France-Presse (AFP) Tuesday, April 1.
Twelve
days into the war, the British authorities "reached what is known
as credibility fatigue, in other words there is non-consistency, their
distortions and exaggerations are too obvious," Crook stressed.
The
manipulation starts from the vocabulary used, like the word
"coalition", added the expert.
"Close
analysis reveals it's primarily a military alliance of the United
Kingdom and the United States. The idea is that they want to pretend
that the wider world is supporting" the war, Crook said.
He
charged that the propaganda techniques employed by Britain include the
use of strong statements based on information from a vague origin such
as unnamed intelligence sources.
"When
inconsistencies appear, the authorities can then say they had never made
a direct claim themselves," noted the expert.
Distortion
& Exaggeration
Crook
said that the war briefings coming daily from Downing Street and the
U.S. Central Command in Qatar are not to-the-point, adding that American
and British officials were beating about the bush.
Citing
an example, he recalled the Downing Street as saying: "We are not
saying definitively that these explosions were caused by Iraqi missiles.
But people should approach this (Iraqi claim) with due scepticism,"
which was made by Downing Street.
For
Crook, this style of response lacks credibility and has a
"boomerang" effect, reflecting a "decay in trust and
authority" of the government.
In
another case, he added, Blair said last week at a press conference in
Camp David after a war summit with U.S. President George W. Bush, that
two dead British soldiers had been "executed" in southern
Iraq.
Crook
said Blair was guilty of a "dangerous high-risk distortion and
exaggeration. He went too far. (It was) a significant mistake."
The
expert said claims that there was some sort of popular uprising in the
strategic southern Iraqi city of Basra, and that there were Al-Qaeda
fighters present in Iraq, have also been met with scepticism.
In
another high-profile case of manipulating information, even before the
war started, Britain produced a report which insisted that Baghdad
possessed weapons of mass destruction. The report was praised at the
U.N. Security Council by U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell.
But
it later emerged that a large section of the report was lifted word for
word from an old doctoral thesis written by an American academic of an
Iraqi origin a decade ago, Crook recalled.